Andrew Feenberg’s Questioning Technology, available ‘en français’

Philosopher of technology Andrew Feenberg‘s book Questioning Technology has been highly influential on my thinking over the past few years, so I was recently pleased to learn that his 1999 book was actually translated into French in 2004. Better still, it has been made available for free as a downloadable PDF. Especially useful for me was Feenberg’s critique and extension of Habermas’ theories of purposive and communicative rationality into technology.

Habermas tends to argue that technology is not a medium unto itself, capable of being affected by social forces; it is rather an extrinsically rational mediator, for other media, like law. Feenberg does an excellent job of countering this view, by showing how technology in fact offers a set of precise parallels to law. Through instrumentalizations embedded into technical codes (like, for example, the structured data protocols that support social computing) technology guides purposive action juridically: just as Habermas conceives of law as a coordinating media, technology

1) operates as both idealized institution and form of mediation;
2) mediates between system and lifeworld, in ways that are sometimes pathological;
3) makes nominal claims on our actions through prescriptions embedded into its design; and
4) has a reserve backing just like the other media.

Feenberg writes for example that, “Power requires means of enforcement; in the case of technology, the natural consequences of error have a similar function, often mediated by organizational sanctions of some sort. If you refuse the technical norms, say, by driving on the wrong side of the street, you risk your life. ”

His writing may sometimes not be for the faint of heart, but Feenberg’s ideas are always painstakingly well-argued. In English or in French, he is definitely worth your time.

Posted in Uncategorized

Abstract for the Marxism and New Media conference

Managed to get an abstract together for this upcoming conference at Duke. Would be great to hear what Alexander Galloway is up to these days, he’s doing the keynote.

Social computing and the exchange-relation

This paper argues that real-time social computing environments are organizing electronic utterances in such a way as to foster a kind of social-semantic market effectivity. Using the example of the k-nearest-neighbour algorithm, it argues that the underlying epistemological commitments that metabolize social computing reproduce, at the level of their technics, a Kantian schism between Nature and Society—one that Latour has called our modern Constitution. Affordances for indexing user utterances into computable units, and the mathematical procedures subsequently performed upon these utterances through aggregation, combine to activate what Latour calls a process of separation, purification and reblending, which constantly reproduces the schism.

From a more clearly Marxist perspective, the paper goes on to argue that this arrangement tends to reproduce the commodity-relation at the level of discourse. Key to this second claim is Slavoj Žižek’s efforts to connect declarative utterances and symbolic authority with the ideas of the epistemologist Alfred Sohn-Rethel. Žižek, for example, explains the Kantian categories of pure reason through Sohn-Rethel in the following way:

“…the apparatus of the categories presupposed, implied by the scientific procedure (that, of course, of the Newtonian science of nature), the network of notions by means of which it seizes nature, is already present in the social effectivity, already at work in the act of commodity exchange. Before thought could arrive at pure abstraction, the abstraction was already at work in the social effectivity of the market.”

Embedded into the designs of social computing, neo-Kantian epistemological abstractions that mark out the role of the rational speech act are blending with algorithms like k-nearest-neighbour, and the unconscious of the social computing user conceived as a transcendental subject, to produce what Žižek calls an Other Scene: external to thought, but giving form to thought. The paper argues that the main effect of this form is to induce and maintain a technological separation between use-value and exchange-value in the networked circulation of living utterances.

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged

Defense complete!

Well, it’s official. The PhD defense is over and I made it through the wilderness. Just a few changes to make, principally to do with how I get the historical connection between structured data and logical positivism wrong in a rather ham-handed way. That’s what happens when you let a humanities person into the clean room, I guess. Still have a ways to go in my understanding of how analytic philosophy connects with computationalism.

Here’s the PhD abstract in case anyone is interested:

Social computing as social rationality

This project concerns the ways in which social computing functions as a rational steering medium in network societies. Exploring cases that include the structured data protocols of an ascendant “Web 3.0”, Google PageRank and collaborative filtering services, the work unearths some key intellectual commitments at work in the technologies. Each software structure constructs a kind of social rationality, by combining the lived experience of users with its rationalizing computational processes. The cases have been chosen as among those digital tools increasingly relied upon to coordinate action in everyday life: organizing people and knowledge in diverse ways, recalibrating the operations of large bureaucracies and institutions, serving as new feedback mechanisms for the network economy, and functioning as novel formats for everyday communication between friends, family and citizenry.

To help compare the cases, the project spends one chapter outlining several philosophical forms of rationality. Doing so helps in turn to highlight three aspects of social computing: how certain conditions of epistemic validity and successful action are being encoded into software algorithms and protocols; how each case rationally models the achievement of consensus, via some configuration of the semantics and pragmatics of language, and finally, how each case enrols distributed social participation to potentiate the conditions of its operation.

Posted in Uncategorized

Digital Humanities conference @ Guelph

This looks interesting, will be sure to put in an abstract.

UPDATE: Cancelled! Quel dommage.

CFP: Interdisciplinary Graduate Student Conference 3rd Future Theory Conference:

Future Theory, Present Praxis: Humanities as Digital Discipline University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada November, 2011

Hosted by the SETS department of U of Guelph Future Theory, Present Praxis: Humanities as Digital Discipline

In the summer of 2010 the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada put out a call for knowledge synthesis projects on the digital economy. This funding opportunity not only identified the digital economy as a major player in Canada’s economic and cultural future, but also demanded that researchers in the humanities and social sciences step forward to play a role in articulating the parameters and concerns of that future. As an institutional acknowledgement of the increasingly fundamental interrelations between the humanities and the digital sphere, SSHRC’s initiation of the knowledge synthesis projects is a key but not unique instance of the increasing institutionalization of the digital humanities in Canada. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized

Poster for The Indiscernible

Poster for The Indiscernible graduate conferenceThis one is a bit long in the tooth by now, but I was proud of how it turned out. It was a one-day interdisciplinary conference put on by the AHCS Graduate Student Association; Brian Massumi keynoted.

Posted in Media

Twenty minutes you’ll wish you could get back.

Towards a discursive informatics from Neal Thomas on Vimeo.

So back in late 2008 or early 2009, there was a competition circulating for students to envision the future of social computing. Given that I was knee-deep in a bunch of theory at the time, trying to make sense of philosophical accounts of meaning and the social, the idea of producing something speculative on this theme was appealing.

What came out the other end was a fairly faulty mix of information studies, philosophy, and half-baked ideas. Rest assured that I did not win. If I knew now what I knew then… It would probably be only slightly more coherent. Let’s call it a stage in my thinking, pieces of which still remain embedded in my overall understanding of where social computing needs to go next. Will also have to get past my penchant for the visually somber (as evidenced even today with this website!)

Posted in Media

Differences in social computing

The 5th Annual SIG Social Informatics Research Symposium took place in Vancouver, BC back in 2009. It was a first chance for me to try out some of the dissertation research in public, and went okay given the usual disciplinary gulfs and my tendency to over-complicate matters. You can view the slides as they were presented if you’re interested.

Posted in Media

Imagining Citizenship: The Digital Literacies Symposium

Network Thinking, Boundary Objects and Collective IntelligenceBack in 2009 I had the pleasure of serving on a working group with Prof. Stuart Poyntz, in preparation for the SFU-sponsored Imagining Citizenship: The Digital Literacies Symposium. Our workshop was an overview of the relationship between youth media production, web-enabled collective intelligence and the continued formation of network societies. You can view the slides as they were presented, if you’re interested; a significant portion of the material relies on Darin Barney’s excellent book, The Network Society.

Posted in Media